🔗 Share this article

Are your LinkedIn followers recognizing you as a thought leader? Are hordes of commenters applauding your insights on growing your business? Are headhunters making contact to discuss collaborations?

Should that not be the case, the explanation might be that you're not male.

The Experiment: Modifying Gender Identity to achieve Increased Reach

Numerous female professionals participated in a collective LinkedIn experiment recently following viral posts indicated that changing their gender to "male" boosted their network presence.

Some participants modified their profiles to incorporate what they called "bro-coded" terminology - inserting action-focused professional jargon like "drive", "revolutionize" and "expedite". Based on reports, their visibility similarly increased.

Algorithmic Bias Questions Raised

The improved metrics has caused some to wonder whether an inherent gender bias in the platform's system favors men who employ professional networking terminology.

Like most major social media platforms, LinkedIn employs an algorithm to decide which posts are shown to which members - boosting some while reducing others.

Company Statement

Through a blog post, LinkedIn acknowledged the trend but stated it does not factor in "personal characteristics" when deciding post visibility. Rather, the company mentioned that "hundreds of signals" influence how content perform.

Modifying profile gender on your profile does not influence how your posts appears in results or timelines.

Individual Results

Simone Bonnett, who changed her gender identifiers to "male pronouns" and her name to "a masculine version", described remarkable results.

"The numbers I'm seeing show a 1,600% increase in profile views and a 1,300% increase in content views," she commented.

Megan Cornish, a communications strategist, began experimenting after noticing her audience decline significantly.

The Process

• Initially, she modified her profile gender to "man"
• Then, she used artificial intelligence to rephrase her profile using "male-coded" wording
• Finally, she recycled old posts with comparable "agentic" style

The outcome was immediate: a 415% increase in reach within seven days.

The Downside

Despite the success, Cornish expressed unhappiness with the method.

"Previously, my posts were softer - brief and insightful, but also friendly and relatable," she explained. "Now, the bro-coded version was forceful and confident - like a white male being overly confident."

She discontinued the test after one week, saying "Every day I persisted, and outcomes got better, I became angrier."

Varying Outcomes

Not all participants experienced favorable outcomes. One writer who changed both her profile gender to "male" and her ethnicity to "Caucasian" reported a decrease in visibility and engagement.

"We understand there's systemic preference, but it's extremely difficult to comprehend how it functions in specific cases or why," she remarked.

Broader Implications

These tests occur alongside continuing conversations about LinkedIn's unique position as both a professional network and community site.

Recent changes in the past few months have apparently resulted in female creators experiencing significantly reduced visibility, resulting in informal experiments where identical content by male and female users received vastly different reach.

System Details

According to LinkedIn, the platform uses artificial intelligence to categorize and distribute content based on multiple factors, including post content and the user's professional identity.

The company claims it frequently assesses its algorithms, including "checks for inequalities based on gender."

A spokesperson suggested that recent declines in some users' reach might originate from higher volume due to additional posts on the network.

Evolving Environment

According to a tester noted, "bro-coding" appears to be growing on the platform.

"Users typically consider LinkedIn as more businesslike and polished," she remarked. "That's changing. It's turning into increasingly competitive and less controlled."