🔗 Share this article

The count of guaranteed positions for Māori representatives on NZ councils will be slashed by over 50%, following a controversial legislative amendment that required municipal councils to put the future of hard-won Māori seats to a public vote.

Historical Context on Indigenous Representation

Māori wards, which may have one or more councillors based on demographic data, were created in 2001 to provide Indigenous voters the option to vote for a assured Māori representative in municipal and provincial governments. Originally, local governments could only establish a Indigenous seat by initially putting it to a public vote in their area. Local populations often devoted considerable time building community backing and pushing their councils to create Indigenous representation.

Policy Changes and Government Actions

To remedy the issue, the former administration permitted municipal authorities to establish a Māori ward without first requiring them to put it to a public vote.

But in 2024, the right-wing coalition government reversed the change, stating communities should decide whether to establish Indigenous representation.

Voting Outcomes

The coalition’s law change mandated councils that had established a electoral district under Labour’s rules to hold binding referendums alongside the municipal polls, which concluded on October 11. Out of 42 local governments participating in the referendum, 17 decided to retain their seats, and twenty-five to disestablish theirs – showing many regions against guaranteed Māori representation.

These outcomes represented “a crucial move in reinstating local democratic control.”

Critics however have criticised the government’s law change as “racist” and “against Indigenous interests”. Since taking office, the current administration has implemented extensive reversals to policies intended to improve Indigenous welfare and political inclusion. Officials has said it wants to end “race-based” approaches, and says it is committed to enhancing results for Indigenous people and every citizen.

Geographical Splits

The results of the referendums were divided down urban-rural lines – most cities required to vote supported Indigenous seats, while countryside areas leaned strongly towards removing them.

“It’s a real shame for the Māori wards that had only just come in – they’re only just starting to hit their stride.”

Electoral Participation and Concerns

This year’s municipal polls registered the lowest voter turnout in 36 years, with under one-third of citizens participating, prompting calls for an overhaul.

This approach had been “a mockery”.

Differential Standards

Councils are able to create other types of electoral districts – such as countryside seats – without first requiring a public vote. The different conditions placed on Māori wards suggested the government was targeting Māori representation.

“Well, they failed. Numerous localities have expressed strong opposition.”

This remark concerned the 17 areas that chose to keep their seats.